But, instead, there are more and more people using the to become amateur finger drummers. The actual empowering part of DAW tech is that you're no longer bound by the drummers in your area.or studios.if there's a guy in Indiana with a great kit set up who plays well, you can have him cut tracks regardless of platform. I just get testy because there's a lot of drummers out there who play great and do remote sessions which will kill for not big dollars. The below link is what i'm talking about, it's a thing of beauty as a drum part, it stands on its own as a piece of music, you don't even need the rest of the band! It's pure emotion, you can hear him growling into transitions, I understand that it's not easily accomplished, but this "emotion" is what people should be striving for musically, it's what makes great music great, somehow this idea has been completely lost on todays cut n paste music?
#Steinberg groove agent demo free#
I understand why someone would use BFD to write, as these samples are recorded well, but they never sound real when you pattern them together, total emotion free groove killers, and astoundingly, they're everywhere? The SC samples sound void of groove, and extremely robotic to me as usual. JMO, It may be a good writing tool? but those things will never match the real deal, as long as a competent drummer is in the moment, emotionally charged, and musically minded. But, that just comes down to how much you like the drummer who played for them-and their take on beats (what IS a mid tempo funk beat to THEM). And if you need inspiring beats-wow.aren't there midi libraries out there.that are cheap and use with whatever sounds you want? I do remember the original Steinberg Groove Agent had some beats in it I loved.sounds were terrible, so I always just internally routed the midi out from it to BFD. That's been mostly mature tech for decades. You want something that sounds like a record when you tap. I mean-when you're coming up with a song idea, you don't need (or WANT) the kind of complexity of an accurate drum library. No one knows when I use BFD2.unless they're a drummer focusing on figuring out tells of midi. Two very different levels of quality.very different uses. It' the difference in the day of who had a drum machine and who had a drum sampler. Let EZDrummer and the like have that audience. Whether you find the built in beats useful or not doesn't speak to the sample quality-those are just a little midi library of content they all come with-that I wish they didn't.
But, certainly if you don't own a comprehensive library (ala BFD2 or Superior2).you buy this-no questions asked, IMO.īeats or sounds? Those are two very different things. I don't think sample SOUND is the problem.
#Steinberg groove agent demo software#
However, I will also say that FXpansion-I've had some personal dealings with them, and they are a stand up a company-which I can't say for most of the interactions I've had with software companies. I have a hard time imagining buying this. If you need a processed kit, they should've just had some "economy" kits that were pre blended to various balances and served as better "tap out a demo and have it sound like a record out of the gate"-but. I felt like RealGigaDrums did it, but didn't have many kits, and what a huge PIA to use with different mic layers.along came BFD and gave it a better GUI to work with the various mics-but, they were a small company and didn't spend the money to get a great set up (so the third party addons were CRUCIAL).so, they fixed that with BFD2 by using Air Studios, a BIGGER selections of drums, and gave people the ability to process inside the engine, which I frankly don't much understand. I don't know, man.I honestly feel like drum sampling is done.
0 kommentar(er)
